The government has promised to demonstrate against the act of usurpation of the garden by developers, according to a report that there is a problem in many parts of England.
Fifty of the 127 municipalities responding to the survey, said that based on past or empty green land was a concern.
Housing Minister John Healey said that local authorities do not have adequate plans were leaving an open door and promised that guidelines to address hot spots .
Labor Conservatives said that because of denial about its role in the problem.
Garden ownership refers to the practice of building houses on open land in existing urban and suburban residences, population density, and activists say, harms the character of a closed room.
The Government commissioned research, scientists at Kingston University has sent a survey to 363 planning authorities in England.
Of 127 respondents, 50 said it was a problem in their areas. Of these, only seven of specific policies to address it.
Councils in London was the Southeast and the West Midlands region is more likely that the effects of garden-grabbing report.
Mr Healey pledged to strengthen the policy advice of Whitehall, said: The Council, leaving an open door for inappropriate development unless they have local plans in place and power in the hands of this attitude.
The Council has the tools necessary to address this issue and this evidence suggests that if a local policy in place that you can judge exactly the need of new homes have already been developed on land with its own characteristics power to protect the bottom of the fourth .
If these areas do not want one problem reported by events on earth that are committed his hands, why not a local project. Mr. Healey said the issue could look and feel of the community, said the survey indicated, however, was not a problem in most areas.
I am determined to maintain this situation and to see a tougher stand on a small number of garden grabbing access points.

UK targets for cutting carbon emissions by 2050 will not be met without radical changes to the engineering of buildings, a report says.
One of the study’s authors criticised the government’s “woeful track record on setting ill-considered targets”.
The Royal Academy of Engineering report lays out a groundwork for reducing the environmental impact of new buildings as well as refurbishment of old ones.
It added there was a serious skills gap in the sector that could grow worse.
The report, called Engineering a Low Carbon Built Environment said that many building principles, such as those that retain heat in a building or make good use of natural light, were known to the Romans but are still not being implemented in modern buildings as much as they could be.
The field of “building engineering physics”, which draws on old ideas and new, can address the issue. But the report warns that both the industry and academia are so far failing to produce engineers who can apply the concepts.
“There are plenty of good examples of buildings around which have been designed with this approach, but there’s very little uptake of these ideas,” the report’s co-author Professor Doug King said.
He held up the example of the Sainsbury’s in London’s Greenwich as an example of the savings that such building approaches can provide.
While it almost certainly cost significantly more to build than a less eco-friendly building, he estimated that the building saved more than ￡400,000 a year in energy costs.
“If Sainsbury’s had built everyone of their new stores in the last 10 years to this model, then Lord John would be a much happier man in a recession like this,” he said.
Contrastingly, Professor King railed against what he termed “eco-bling” – the tendency for many new building projects to fail to reduce their overall energy consumption and then tack on energy generation schemes such as wind turbines or solar panels in a high-visibility effort to make up for some of the wasted energy.
The report stresses that the government should support detailed study into how to increase training in building physics, and by how much, in order to ensure the new build projects and refurbishments bring environmental sustainability into line with planned targets.
Because 80% of the buildings that will be occupied in 2050 have already been built, the problem lies more in refurbishments of existing buildings than it does in “new build”.

A molecule designed to locate, preserve, and then try to hardening of the arteries may represent a new way to treat heart disease, say its inventors.
Nanoburrs, developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), have only damaged cells in the walls of blood vessels.
Once connected, the drug delivery to the right place.
However, the British Heart Foundation warns that the technology will be a few years used in patients.
The hardening of the arteries that feed the heart and can ultimately lead to atherosclerosis, blockages that can cause heart attacks.
The study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Magazine says that specialists often use small balloon to force open to the vessels, and then hold a tube called a catheter place openly in them.
Often the process leads to a rapid re-growth of tissue around the prosthesis, which can re-blockage of the artery, and a recent advance has kept a drug-eluting stents in a number of days after the onset, the process under control.
The MIT approach offers another way to these drugs to get the exact position.
Your nanoburrs are proteins that follow a structure of the vessel wall, such as the membrane cellar known coated.
This is only visible when the wall is damaged, so that only parts of the damaged blood vessels under way.
If present, there is an updated response to the release of medication over a longer period – up to 12 days.
Professor Robert Langer, one of the authors of the research, said: This is a very interesting example of nanotechnology and the orientation of cells in action. He said that the technology could each state has in the cell wall have been damaged in this way, infested, including certain cancers and other inflammatory diseases.

The vice-chairman of the UN’s climate science panel has admitted it made a mistake in asserting that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) included the date in its 2007 assessment of climate impacts.
A number of scientists have recently disputed the 2035 figure, and Jean-Pascal van Ypersele told BBC News that it was an error and would be reviewed.
But he said it did not change the broad picture of man-made climate change.
The issue, which BBC News first reported on 05 December, has reverberated around climate websites in recent days.
Some commentators maintain that taken together with the contents of e-mails stolen last year from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, it undermines the credibility of climate science.
Dr van Ypersele said this was not the case.
“I don’t see how one mistake in a 3,000-page report can damage the credibility of the overall report,” he said.
“Some people will attempt to use it to damage the credibility of the IPCC; but if we can uncover it, and explain it and change it, it should strengthen the IPCC’s credibility, showing that we are ready to learn from our mistakes.”
The claim that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035 appears to have originated in a 1999 interview with Indian glaciologist Syed Hasnain, published in New Scientist magazine.
The figure then surfaced in a 2005 report by environmental group WWF – a report that is cited in the IPCC’s 2007 assessment, known as AR4.
An alternative genesis lies in the misreading of a 1996 study that gave the date as 2350.
AR 4 asserted: “Glaciers in the Himalayas are receding faster than in any other part of the world… the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high.”
Dr van Ypersele said the episode meant that the panel’s reviewing procedures would have to be tightened.
The row erupted in India late last year in the run-up to the Copenhagen climate summit, with opposing factions in the government giving radically different narratives of what was happening to Himalayan ice.

Two U.S. women came, Haiti, after an interview with a radio station to wait for news from the BBC for their families in the earthquake in the country.
Kathy Johnson said Herland Lepine believed the only two Haitians living in Reading, Berkshire.
They met after hearing the talk on the BBC Berkshire 7.0 magnitude killed tens of thousands of people.
Mrs. Johnson said her uncle had died and was concerned about five cousins.
On Friday he made a public appeal to locate relatives in the capital, Port-au-Prince.
The 39-year-old financial manager, who has lived in Shinfield for 22 years, said: The last days I have called my uncle who is missing and children and other relatives.
Unfortunately, yesterday I received word from home that actually achieve. I still do not know the fate of others.
Mrs. Johnson asked Mrs. Lepine home after learning that they both lived in the same city.
Lepine said women who have not yet heard of his family.
He said: I could not get along at all. I have my mother and everything. Near tears, she added: It’s good for someone who has about the same thing. Kathy Johnson and Herland Lepine satisfied after talking to listen to the BBC BerkshireMs Johnson, who said the representative of the United Haitians reading in the United Kingdom, was asking for help, but more memory.
The group has donated two rooms in London, where he said any help would be executed before, sent to Haiti.
We are desperately looking for space to cover the South, he said.
He will call for donations for medical care, calling for food and clothing subject.
We also ask everyone with a courier company or airline that you can donate the space or one or two points. The British have so far donated more than 15 meters from the disaster and the Emergency Committee (December), a group of 13 large UK, based charities to receive complaints on television and radio have moved.